Tribal Nudism

It’s a bit funny when you think about it, that no matter how rich or famous or powerful you are, underneath our clothes, we all look the same. Kamala Harris, arguably the most powerful woman in the world, would not look out of place standing naked in the jungle amongst the Zoë. The same goes for Beyonce and Serena Williams and any darker-skinned celebrity you can imagine. This is by no means a dig at non-white ethnicities. If Britney Spears looks out of place in the rainforest, it’s only because her naked ancestors died out long ago. No doubt, Britney’s Aryan locks would be more suited to the Celtic warriors of antiquity, who marched against their Roman enemies wearing nothing but paint.

Celtic warriors fought nude

Since becoming a nudist, I have met people who refuse to believe that humans have ever lived customarily naked in any meaningful way. They insist nudism is an unnatural aberration, far removed from the norms of any conceivable society, and that tribal people the world over have always worn the minimal loincloth to hide their genitals. But the belief that we are inherently born with body shame, that exposing our sex organs is essentially unnatural and that we are all *meant* to wear clothes, is a deeply ingrained myth, resulting from our witch-burning, anti-Pagan heritage, a heritage that has spread to every corner of the world via the barrel of a gun. When debating the merits of a nudist worldview with my detractors, this often comes up as a point of contention. Their arguments go something like this: the fact that we don’t “run around naked” is what separates us from the animal kingdom. Since we don’t have fur, we wear clothes, or, our natural fur is the clothing we produce. Or, we have to cover our genitals because we walk upright. Nature documentaries also get in on the act, perpetuating the view that homo-sapiens arose from their lowliest ancestors circa one million years ago with a club and a loincloth. Of course, this ignores the fact that other apes stand semi-upright, unafraid to show us their goods, and that we do, in fact, have our own fur, it’s just very fine, and localized around our scalps and genitals.

Early man

Our earliest human ancestors appeared two million years ago, with homo sapiens, the category we currently fall into, not arriving on the scene until 300,000 years ago. And, throughout that time, every human on the planet was essentially a nudist. Textiles later developed as a result of migrations from Africa to the Eurasian continents, which, during the Ice Age, saw much colder climates. Accepting the earliest estimates we have for clothing, circa 170,000 years ago, people roamed the planet for 130,000 without a stitch to their name. Taking the much shorter, 30,000-year estimate, we could claim that for the vast majority of human existence, a full 270,000 years, we lived as nudists! But even after the use of clothing became common, nakedness as a cultural taboo did not exist until the Christian era.

Clearly, the belief that wearing clothes is synonymous with being human is a modern cultural bias that has nothing to do with biology. It ignores the findings of history and anthropology and the many civilizations for whom casual nudity was the norm: namely the Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and Celts, as well as tribes in the Amazon, Africa, and Asia. It also ignores the existence of modern nudists, who live naked 24/7. Are we not human?

During the medieval period, clothing was adapted to indicate status, wealth, and moral standing. Aristocrats dressed in expensive finery while their slaves, the destitute, and the imprisoned lived in rags. When Columbus discovered the people of the New World going about their idyllic nude lives, his European biases regarding proper attire greatly influenced their mistreatment. In the colonial days that followed, this prejudice was used to justify oppression. The massacre of the Aztecs by the Spaniards and the enslavement of Africans by much of Europe and the Americas was largely based on the belief that naked people were of lesser worth. Since animals don’t wear clothes, it was reasoned, naked humans could be treated like animals.

Grotesque? I don’t think so!

In Madhusree Mukerjee’s book, The Land of Naked People, British and Indian sailors clash again and again with the prehistoric tribes of the Andaman Islands. In 1794, Lieutenant Robert Hyde described the Jarawa this way, “They go quite naked, the women wearing only at times a kind of tassel, or fringe, round the middle; which is intended merely for ornament, as they do not betray any signs of bashfulness when seen without it.” Clearly, Hyde is describing here a truly nudist culture, a people naked yet unashamed, the very existence of which must have offended the sensibilities of the British, who did not hesitate in trying to take the natives captive, and later, meeting scouting parties with violence. From the 18th century onward, attempts were made to pacify the Andaman, Jarawa, Onge, and Sentinelese tribes native to the region. The centuries’ long clash of cultures has resulted in the near-extinction of these groups, people that had been thriving in the Indian Ocean for tens of thousands of years. With much of their habitat deforested by foreign lumber industries, many Andamans have taken to local customs, marrying into Indian households while losing their language, their hunting and gathering lifestyles, and of course, their freedom from Western taboos. Greed is the culprit, as is always the case, but the islanders’ exploitation was predicated on the belief that the British could show them a better life. On the contrary, Mukerjee suggests that before the colonial powers’ arrival, these clothes-free aboriginals lived idyllic lives, subsisting off of fish, crab, and wild boar. Assumptions of cannibalism, among other horrific traits commonly attributed to naked tribes, proved to be unfounded. Mukerjee suggests that even the concept of rape did not exist for them because no word for rape existed in their language. Incidentally, sailors often raped their female captives, despite the Jarawa women being frequently described as grotesque.

In the ongoing effort to civilize the Andamans, the British were instructed to kidnap native children, forcing them into modern clothing, housing, and schools. But even after learning how to read and write, many of these children, by then adults, escaped back to the jungle. On one occasion, Mukerjee writes, a homesick boy living some years on a British vessel was sent home, but when the sailors urged him to remove his clothes so that his people would recognize him, he refused, having already developed a sense of shame. When Mukerjee visited the Onge to research her book, she found they would dress when foreigners were present, which might explain why you often see photos of tribal people in Nike shorts. After decades of contact with the outside world, primitive tribes have had body shame imposed upon them, but as Mukerjee writes,

“From what I’d read, the Onge hadn’t gotten the hang of clothes. They didn’t wash them and so got skin diseases; they didn’t change out of wet clothes, and so contracted colds and tuberculosis. They were far healthier before being forced to cover up.”

Clearly, if the Onge had been accustomed to the minimal loincloth, they would have known to deal with parasites (particularly when it comes to underwear) but they didn’t, because total nakedness had always been the norm in their society.

Later, in a bit of self-reflection, Mukerjee seems to stumble upon a bit of nudist philosophy when she writes,

“They were all boys and men, clad in waistbands, armbands, headbands, and necklaces, made of leaves and shells and red threads. They had no facial, body, or pubic hair that I could see. They were not self-conscious about nakedness, and in that heat, it was my neck-to-ankle clothing that felt out of place. Wearing only ornaments seemed natural and logical.”

The Zoë is a well-documented naturist society.

The Zoë of the Amazon, the Surma (below) of Ethiopia, and the people of the Andaman Islands, among many lost and forgotten tribes, all share one thing in common: they prove that being human and not wearing clothes is not mutually exclusive. From our earliest hominid ancestors to the Ancient Olympian athlete to tribes still thriving today, we are all nudists with a shared humanity. This is an important distinction because it teaches us about acceptance, that no matter how different our way of life, our traditions, our habits, we are all essentially human. If we can learn to see one another as we truly are, naked as we come from the womb, we find there is little that divides us.

Donga Stick Fighting Ritual, Surma Tribe, Omo Valley, Ethiopia - License,  download or print for £71.55 | Photos | Picfair

9 thoughts on “Tribal Nudism

Add yours

  1. Hi Nick

    Yet another well written, thoughtful and thought provoking article. So called western civilisation has a lot to answer for. Destroying cultures was just the start! We also mustn’t forget that the Europeans were mostly unhygienic and unclean and brought devastating diseases to so many Aboriginal people and cruelly wiped out countless innocents. If only world history reflected a better picture of humanity. At least those of us who recognise the innocence and freedom (and comfort) of simple nudity can feel a semblance of connection with those whose original culture and daily lives supported naturism without even having to give it a name!

    Cheers, Andrew

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Hi Nick
    Congratulations! Yet another well-written, thoughtful and thought provoking article. So-called western civilisation has a lot to answer for! Destroying cultures was just the beginning! We also mustn’t forget that the European invaders were mostly unhygienic and largely unclean. They brought devastating diseases to so many Aboriginal people and cruelly wiped out countless innocents. If only world history reflected a better respect for the breadth of humanity! At least those of us who recognise the innocence and freedom (and comfort) of simple nudity can feel a semblance of connection with those whose original culture and daily lives supported naturism without even having to give it a name! Cheers. Andrew

    Liked by 3 people

  3. The modern clothing taboo, which wakes the wearing of clothes a moral imperative, is actually a fairly modern thing. I would point the finger at the Victorian era for finally making it like that. Something I only discovered recently, while researching what the Bible actually teaches about nudity, was that our current attitudes to nudity are cultural attitudes that Christians like myself had written into our understanding of the Bible. Mind you, we were largely to blame for the progression of attitudes which led to what we see now. The game changer for me was the discovery that till at least the fourth century, baptisms were nude. And that the Bible doesn’t actually condemn nudity in general. Only the exploitation of nudity.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. It is true that there are numerous Christian nudists in America, and that quite a few passages from the Bible supports nudism. The early Church embraced depictions of naked angels, prophets, Jesus, and even God. Michaelangelo’s naked David is known the world over, and nudity features prominently in the murals of Catholic cathedrals, the Sistene Chapel being the most famous among them.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I believe the early Christian artists were reflecting what they knew to be true. The Bible says God made humans on his image. Its description of that is gendered. Gender is biological. When I see a naked human, for me, I’m looking at one of God’s self portraits. And it’s amazing how many shapes an sizes they come in. It hurts me deeply that I taught my kids that their body was something they needed to cover up. That there was some kind of shame if anyone other than their spouse saw them unclothed. I taught them because I believed it was true, just as my parents and grandparents did.

        A book I was reading recently, describes an anthropologist in the 1870s who was studying naked tribes in Niger. He talked about their depravity and immorality. He then said that they had stronger sexual morality than anything he’d ever seen back in Europe. We forced them to wear clothes. Now they are up there with the highest rates of AIDS in the world.

        Liked by 2 people

  4. Social nudity is a great equalizer, a subject (equality) that seems to be quite popular these days. Agree that if social nudity was normal everywhere there would be no need for the term nudist. That said we as nudists typically don’t judge others by their skin colors either. Judgements are made based on actions and what is perceived to be in a person’s heart. The reality is that clothing does more to sexualize the human body than just full nudity.


  5. Very well written! As a nudist/naturist and a Christian, I applaud your article. I have no qualms reconciling my nudity with my faith, in that the late great Pope St John Paul wrote that “The human body can remain nude and uncovered and preserve intact it’s splendour and it’s beauty… Nakedness as such is not to be equated with physical shamelessness…immodesty is present only when nakedness plays a negative role with regard to the value of a person…The human body is not in itself shameful.. Shamelessness(just like shame and modesty) is a function of the interior of a person.” So there is my mantra.. “To be naked is to be yourself… to be naked in nature is to be at peace with the world.”

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑